Monday, April 11, 2011

Acting in the National Interest

Do politicians typically act in the national interest?

Did the government of Ireland, when making the debts of the banks into the debts of the nation, do that in the national interest?

When the Irish politicians "coerced" the people of Ireland into voting for the European Constitution, did they do that in the national interest?

Did the Republican party when agreeing to continue funding Planned  Parenthood, do that in the national interest?

Did the kings of France when neglecting to consecrate France to the Sacred Heart, act in the national interest?

When the Popes and bishops of the world refused to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart, whose interest were they serving?

When the Federal Reserve loaned billions to the banks of the world, whose interest were they serving?

When our politicians decide to "balance" the budget at the expense of the poor and the elderly, whose interests will they be serving?

The people of Iceland just decided to put national interest before the interests of the bankers!

Many of the people of the Arab world are deciding to put their interests before those of the dictators that rule them!

The interests of the people are served when the politicians serve the PEOPLE not the "Elite"!

If all the members of the Senate are members of the elite, how can the national interest be served?

We are living in the times described in the Apocalypse, (Revelation).

It is time to put our houses in order, especially our spiritual houses.

The national interest will be best served by each one of us asking whose interests are served when our politicians act or fail to act? In my opinion their actions stopped being in the national interest a long time ago.

Saturday, April 9, 2011

"Learn a lesson from the fig tree."

"You will hear of wars and reports of wars; see that you are not alarmed, for these things must happen, but it will not yet be the end. "
"Nation will rise up against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; there will be famines and earthquakes from place to place."
"All these are the labor pains."

Sumatra, December 2004, 9.1
Peru,  August 2007, 8.0
Chile, February 2010, 8.8
New Zealand, September 2010, 7.2
Japan, March 2011, 8.1
Japan, April 2011, 7.1
USA, ???, ?.?

Are we ready?

Friday, April 8, 2011

When the Son of Man Returns Will He Find Faith on the Earth?

Why did Pope John Paul II, soon to be Blessed John Paul, not order the bishops of the world to join with him when he consecrated the world to the Blessed Virgin in 1984?

Why did John Paul II not proclaim the Fifth Marian Dogma, recognising the Blessed Virgin Mary as Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix and Advocate of the people of God?

Could it be that he was trying to avoid a schism in the Roman Catholic Church?

Why would John Paul II think that such actions could bring about a schism?

Is it because of what John Paul II, as Pope, read on the single page written by Sister Lucia containing the words of the Mother of  God?

Did the Blessed Virgin suggest certain behaviors of the Church hierarchy would cause a schism?

Was John Paul II restricted in his actions out of concern that a schism not occur on his watch?

How else can one explain why the most Marian Pope in recent history chose not to take two actions that could have given greater recognition to the role of the Blessed Virgin in the economy of salvation.

One can argue that the Fifth Marian Dogma would have made ecumenical relations with Protestants more difficult. That argument was advanced for the Fourth Marian Dogma but history has disproved the thesis.

My opinion is that following Vatican Council II many Bishops of the Roman Catholic Church became quite Protestant. As such, their view of the Blessed Virgin's role in the affairs of the modern Church is greatly diminished. This despite the words at Fatima, "In the end My Immaculate Heart will triumph."

The Blessed Virgin went on to say, "The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to Me, and she will be converted..." What does converted mean? Convered to Christian Orthodoxy or to Roman Catholicism?

Before the Bolshevik revolution and murder of the Czar, Russia was arguably the holiest country in the world. With the conversion of Russia, Catholic orthodoxy might have the greatest of allies.

If there is to be a schism within the Roman Church perhaps Orthodoxy may be able to help the faithful decide which side to choose, given the Orthodox Church was not a participant in Vatican II, (two Russian observers notwithstanding).

Thursday, April 7, 2011

A Bishop Dressed in White

Sister Lucia said, "We had the impression that it was the Holy Father".

"On his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions."

Sister Lucia received the Secret on July 13th, 1917. Despite commentaries to the contrary, could the vision refer to Benedict XVI, the current Pope?

What could possibly cause the Pope and those loyal to him to be so persecuted between now and 2017?

"When the third angel blew his trumpet, a large star burning like a torch fell from the sky.  It fell on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water. The star was called "Wormwood," and a third of all the water turned to wormwood. Many people died from this water, because it was made bitter." (Rev 8, 10 and 11)

Imagine if a part of the Fatima secret provides important deails of a 'star' falling from the sky?
Imagine these details are being withheld because there are other embarassing details about apostasy within the Church at the highest levels?
Imagine how people will react, inside and outside the Church, if Wormwood arrives and it turns out the Church had foreknowledge but failed to act on it?

Jesus said to Sister Lucia in August of 1931:
"Make it known to my ministers that, given they follow the example of the King of France in delaying execution of My command, they will follow him into misfortune."
Notice how Jesus uses the word, 'execution' of my command."

Exactly one hundred years before the French revolution in 1789, Jesus appeared to Sister Margaret Mary Alacoque giving her a message for the King of France, Louis XIV. Neither the Sun King nor his successors acted on the message and exactly 100 years later the monarchy was overthrown.
Jesus did not spare France even though it is the Elder Daughter of the Church.

The Roman Catholic Church is a monarchy. Could it go the way of the French monarchy between now and 2017?

Monday, April 4, 2011

The Third Secret of Fatima

Reading Antoni Socci's book, "The Fourth Secret of Fatima", one finds on page 89, the following quote attributed to Sister Lucia. It was an extremely rare public declaration in which she linked the third part of the Secret to the Apocalypse, (the book of Revelation).


She also indicated precisely Chapters 8 and 13.
Chapter eight refers to Wormwood, a heavenly body that may already be causing geophysical disasters here on earth.
Chapter thirteen describes the Beasts, freemasonry and eccesiastical freemasonry (tools of the Illuminati).

These are the great dangers facing humanity today.
The first, Wormwood, is physical and the second, freemasonry, is spiritual.
In six years it will be the one hundred year anniversay of Fatima - 1917.
Is it reasonable to assume all the events described in the Secret will come to pass within one hundred years?